F5 released a trial version of their famous LTM (Local Traffic Manager) product. The product is valid for 90 days trial use. It can be a great candidate for testing the product for your virtual environment or building a home lab for your F5 Certification studies.(F50-521 and F50-522 exams)
First download the file for your VMware virtual platform (ESX(i) vSphere or Workstation 7)
https://downloads.f5.com/esd/product.jsp?sw=BIG-IP&pro=big-ip_ve&prodesc=BIG-IP+Virtual+Edition
Then generate a registration key for your product that will be used to create the dossier file for activation during initial setup. You can have up to 4 registration keys e-mailed to you :
https://www.f5.com/trial/secure/generate-eval-key.php
The virtual machine has :
1 GB RAM
3 NIC (should be possible to additional NIC for redundant pair heartbeat traffic)
10 GB vdisk
NOTE : Don't try to decrease memory, otherwise you will have problems allocating additional modules to LTM.
You can find the detailed installation document on :
https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ve/releasenotes/product/relnotes_ve_10_1_0.html
Showing posts with label Vmware. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vmware. Show all posts
Friday, February 12, 2010
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Hyper-V Memory Overcommitment in new Service Pack for Windows 2008 R2
One of the features in Vmware Infrastructre that was missing in Hyper-V was over-provisioning of memory resources which is also known as memory overcommitment. A leaked screenshot from Softpedia shows that the dynamic memory management features is about to be included in the next Windows 2008 build.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-Windows-8-Start-Post-RTM-Windows-7-Build-6-1-7700-0-100122-1900-133746.shtml
http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-Windows-8-Start-Post-RTM-Windows-7-Build-6-1-7700-0-100122-1900-133746.shtml
Labels:
Hyper-V,
Vmware,
Windows 2008,
Windows 2008 R2
Sunday, November 15, 2009
How to Rescan SCSI Bus in Linux
I have a RHEL5 lab on my laptop, that's hosted on Vmware 7. For my RHCE prep I usually add/remove disks while the VM is up and running (hot swap). In order to make Redhat recognize the new disk you need to trigger the rescan of the SCSI bus :
NOTE : This works on 2.6 kernel only.
echo “- - -” > /sys/class/scsi_host/hostX/scaninstead of hostX use the HBA ID. It's host0 in my case. Immediately after you can see the new disk on "fdisk -l"
NOTE : This works on 2.6 kernel only.
Labels:
Certification,
Linux,
Redhat Linux,
RHCE,
SCSI,
Vmware
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Tip of the Day : Vmware - Linux Virtual Consoles Keystroke from Vmware
As you know in linux the keystroke from GUI for virtual consoles is CTRL+ALT+Fx. As CTRL+ALT is the keystroke for releasing the mouse from Vm session, these functionalities conflicts. In order to achieve CTRL+ALT+Fx in Vmware :
1. Press CTRL+ALT+Space
2. Only Release Space leaving Ctrl+Alt pressed
3. Press the Function (Fx) key
Labels:
Linux,
Virtual Consoles,
Virtualization,
Vmware
Friday, August 28, 2009
The battle of hypervisor footprints
Microsoft's stance against the statement in Vmware's official site saying Hyper-V has a bigger footprint then ESXi :
http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2009/08/12/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-1-microsoft-hyper-v-server-2008-vmware-esxi-3-5.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2009/08/14/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-2-windows-server-2008-hyper-v-vmware-esx-3-5.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2009/08/17/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-3-windows-server-2008-hyper-v-vmware-esxi-3-5.aspx
Hyper-V Server 2008 vs ESXi 3.5 | June 2008 - June 2009
Hyper-V: 82MB footprint increase with 26 patches
ESXi: 2.7GB footprint increases with 13 patches
Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V vs ESX 3.5 | January 2008 - June 2009
Hyper-V: 408MB footprint increase with 32 patches
ESX: 3GB footprint increases with 85 patches
Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V vs ESXi 3.5 | January 2008 - June 2009
Hyper-V: 408MB footprint increase with 32 patches
ESX: 2.7GB footprint increases with 13 patches
http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2009/08/12/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-1-microsoft-hyper-v-server-2008-vmware-esxi-3-5.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2009/08/14/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-2-windows-server-2008-hyper-v-vmware-esx-3-5.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2009/08/17/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-3-windows-server-2008-hyper-v-vmware-esxi-3-5.aspx
Hyper-V Server 2008 vs ESXi 3.5 | June 2008 - June 2009
Hyper-V: 82MB footprint increase with 26 patches
ESXi: 2.7GB footprint increases with 13 patches
Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V vs ESX 3.5 | January 2008 - June 2009
Hyper-V: 408MB footprint increase with 32 patches
ESX: 3GB footprint increases with 85 patches
Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V vs ESXi 3.5 | January 2008 - June 2009
Hyper-V: 408MB footprint increase with 32 patches
ESX: 2.7GB footprint increases with 13 patches
and now Vmware's official reply :
I'm leaving the final decision to you :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)